

“The defendants in this case defrauded automobile insurance companies by submitting false no-fault insurance claims and subsequently received reimbursements for chiropractic services that were either not medically necessary or were never rendered. Today’s verdict makes it clear that Minnesota does not tolerate insurance fraud.” “The Commerce Fraud Bureau investigates sophisticated fraud schemes and works closely with our other law enforcement partners to bring criminals perpetrating fraud to justice. “Insurance fraud costs all Minnesotans in the form of higher premiums,” said Commerce Commissioner Jessica Looman.

District Court in Minneapolis, Minn., the jury convicted BURKE, IBRAHIM, and KIDD on charges of conspiracy and mail fraud.
Adam john burke trial#
BURKE, IBRAHIM, and KIDD were initially indicted on December 20, 2016, and following a two-week trial before Senior Judge Michael J. Pete Wold and Aaron Morrison for Adam John Burkeĭescription: Minneapolis, MN - Federal Jury Finds Edina Chiropractor And His Patient Recruiters Guilty Of Insurance Fraud ConspiracyĪDAM JOHN BURKE, 33, ABDIRAHIN KHALIF IBRAHIM, 26, and DANA ENOCH KIDD, 36, were found guilty for their roles in a multi-million dollar insurance fraud conspiracy. Plaintiff's Attorney: John E Kokkinen, David Michael Mariaĭefendant's Attorney: Murad Mohammad and Charles Hawkins for Dana Kidd Adam John Burke, Abdirahin Khalif Ibrahim and Dana Enoch Kiddĭistrict of Minnesota Federal Courthouse - Minneapolis, MinnesotaĬourt: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Hennepin County) In addition to practicing intellectual property law, John has returned to Saint Joseph’s College as a guest speaker and an Adjunct Professor teaching law related subject matter to upperclassmen in the Criminal Justice/Sociology department.Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw Instead, John has worked with clients in a wide range of industries in protecting and enforcing their intellectual property rights, including but not limited to: John’s practice is not limited to a specific industry. This likely resulted in John saving his clients a significant amount of money in legal fees that are associated with intellectual property litigation.

This has resulted in John being able to successfully defend against patent and trademark infringement allegations made by third parties without litigation. Since joining Caseiro Burke, John has used his litigation experience to better assist clients in taking a proactive approach in protecting their intellectual property. John has represented clients in matters before state and federal courts in a variety of legal proceedings, including contract and business disputes, criminal defense and general civil matters.
Adam john burke license#
Adam john burke registration#
